JD Vance gave an interview to The Sunday Times on July 5. Ukraine “should not” launch a counteroffensive, he said. It should stay defensive. Indefinitely.
Vance framed this as strategy. Attack is costly. Defense is cheap. Russia’s offensive gains are “approaching zero.” Why spend lives retaking land when time is already on Kyiv’s side?
That argument sounds reasonable in a vacuum. JD Vance may live in a vacuum. But normal humans do not. We live in a week where Russia fired a massive wave of weapons at Kyiv, and Ukraine intercepted none of the 29 ballistic and anti-ship missiles among them. Zero.
Vance’s advice could only possibly work if Ukraine can actually defend itself. That’s the whole premise: hold the line, stay alive, let time do the work. But holding the line requires interceptor missiles, and Ukraine ran out of the ones that matter most on the same night his interview ran. Vance told Kyiv to trust a shield that had just failed completely, supplied by the Pentagon and the president he serves.
In short, he was telling Ukraine to lie back and take it. And this 18-year-old woman did.
By July 7, that single strike had killed at least 27 people across Kyiv and the surrounding region, with more than 100 wounded. It’s one entry in a ledger that now runs past 62,700 verified civilian casualties since the full-scale invasion began, more than 16,000 of them dead, and the UN says the real total is almost certainly higher.
A regime without Patriots
Ukrainian Air Force spokesman Yurii Ihnat laid out the problem. Ukraine has the Patriot launchers. It doesn’t have enough interceptor missiles to fire from them.
Zelensky said it bluntly after the July 6 strike:
“As long as Patriot missiles remain in our allies’ stockpiles, Russia is only encouraged to keep ‘vanquishing’ residential buildings. The United States and Europe have enough strength to stop this terror.”
He says Ukraine needs at least 140 Patriot interceptors to stop an attack the size of the ones now landing routinely. “We are fighting on our own,” he said. “The casualties are exclusively Ukrainian. We’re not even asking for more.”
Ukraine still stops 90 to 100% of cruise missiles and drones. It stopped zero ballistic missiles, because the interceptors that stop ballistic missiles are the one thing running out. The U.S./Israel war with Iran burned through a large share of the global Patriot stockpile. U.S. production of 600 to 650 interceptors a year doesn’t cover multiple active fronts. Earlier this year, the Pentagon, which Vance serves, paused some deliveries to Ukraine specifically.
NATO’s own secretary general confirms the shortage is real, not chosen. “There is a limit on interceptors on NATO territory,” Mark Rutte said days before the summit, adding that the alliance needs to produce more. Ukraine’s foreign minister describes a different problem. Allies are sitting on “thousands of them in storage around the world, kept for potential threats,” Andrii Sybiha said, while Ukraine faces the actual ones every week.
Vance wants Ukraine to fight a purely defensive war using a shield that his own regime won’t provide. He’s dressing up a shortage as a strategy rather than as savagery.
Putin’s accomplices
Phillips O’Brien, the St Andrews strategist who’s been one of the sharpest readers of this war, posted it plainly on Bluesky the morning after the strike. Ukraine couldn’t stop a single ballistic missile. The U.S. is the reason the interceptors aren’t there. Russia has noticed.
His conclusion: “The USA is helping Putin kill Ukrainians.”
He posted that the same week his own vice president went on record telling Ukraine to stand down. Interceptor supply is a lever. Vance’s regime controls it. It’s set to “not enough,” on the same week Washington told Ukraine to stop trying to change the terms of the fight.
Vance’s own math proves him wrong
Vance’s own admission proves it: Russian offensive gains are “approaching zero.”
Russia’s spring-summer push bought little confirmed ground at enormous cost, while Ukraine’s strikes on refineries and ports have triggered fuel rationing across 17 Russian regions. The war has stalled in a way that makes Vance’s 'just keep defending, forever' a much harder sell than he makes it sound.
Russia’s response to that stall hasn’t been to sue for peace. It’s turned outward. Suspected Russian drones have crossed into NATO airspace well over a hundred times since 2024, over military bases in Germany, France, Belgium, the UK, and Denmark. Washington has warned Poland that Moscow may be staging an armed “provocation.” Norway has scrambled jets more than 60 times this year, the most since 2021. A country holding a winning hand doesn’t need to test whether it can rattle the alliance behind its opponent.
The choreography is seamless. Russia’s dictator told Trump, on their July 4 call, that Russian troops had just seized Kostyantynivka. Ukraine’s military disputes this. One unit on the ground called it “disinformation designed to create the illusion of success.” ISW’s read is that Putin routinely inflates frontline claims to Trump so any eventual deal looks like a fair split. Trump is now telling reporters the war is close to over and that Putin “does feel pressure.”
He meets Zelensky in Ankara this week, at the NATO summit, where Zelensky is publicly pressing allies for the interceptors Vance won’t mention.
Vance’s advice doesn’t touch any of this. Russia’s air campaign keeps coming regardless of what Ukraine’s ground forces do. His advice only constrains Ukraine’s half of the war. Russia gets no matching instruction to stand down. And underneath it, the interceptor shortage means Ukraine can’t even fully defend the half Vance told it to stick to.
NATO leaders are set to pledge €70 billion in military support for Ukraine at Ankara this year and next. The United States isn’t putting money into it. The government whose vice president just told Kyiv to hold the line isn’t funding the line.
The Shortage Becomes the Strategy
Ball of Thread, Marcy Wheeler’s telling of how America got to fascism that I produced in 2024, traced how the Trump-Russia story got buried under a manufactured grievance narrative. Kash Patel spent eight years turning a real counterintelligence problem into a persecution story: first the Steele dossier, then January 6, then the documents case. He trained Republicans to treat accountability for Trump as the actual scandal.
The finale argued Patel’s FBI confirmation was the payoff. The FBI’s counterintelligence division exists to make Russian influence operations costly and visible. Install someone atop the bureau who built his whole career on discrediting scrutiny of Russia, and nobody needs to defeat that check in public. It just stops functioning.
Vance is running the same play from a different office. Patel didn’t have to kill FBI oversight of Russia; he just had to convince the party that oversight was the crime, and the institution rotted from the top down. Vance doesn’t have to kill the push to arm Ukraine; he just has to convince Washington that watching Kyiv run out of interceptors was the plan all along, and nobody has to answer for the shortage.
He went on record telling a country under bombardment to stop trying to win, on a week his own government left it defenseless against the missiles doing the killing. Nobody forced him to say it. He chose the week Kyiv buried its dead to tell Kyiv it was fighting wrong.
Translated out of diplomatic language, the vice president of the United States is telling Ukraine: hold still and watch your neighbors die so Vladimir Putin can stop losing.
This isn’t new. In 2016, Paul Manafort and Konstantin Kilimnik worked a “peace plan” to hand Russia the Donbas in exchange for sanctions relief while Manafort chaired Trump’s campaign and owed money to a Russian oligarch. The 2026 version, drafted with Kremlin input and pitched by Trump’s own envoy, trades away the same territory for the same relief. Vance is just delivering the update.
Then Putin will have what you might call Ukraine’s testicles—a strategic chokehold where he can simply lie in wait, regaining power and capital through the regime’s abandonment of any serious sanctions regime, until he is ready to finish off Kyiv.
Everyone knows that is the plan Vance is pushing. JD Vance offers Ukraine a pre-negotiated surrender written in civilian blood. And everyone knows why he is too sneaky and cowardly to say it out loud.
Freedom is worth the fight. Keep our analysis uncompromised and defiant of trillionaire influence: subscribe to THE FARCE newsletter, join the LOLGOP Studios Patreon, or drop a tip. Free or paid, your support keeps us fierce and free.
One of the most disgusting things I've seen today, and this day has been a firehose of disgusting. When Zelenskyy beats these bastards, I hope he can be the leader of the free world.
That argument is crap. You do not win playing defense. You win by making it too costly for the aggressor to continue. Vance and Trump have been playing on Putin’s team and still are. Russia helped Trump in 2016 against Clinton. Ukraine did not help Trump against Biden.